tv Political Capital With Al Hunt Bloomberg December 29, 2013 5:00am-5:31am EST
gingrich.was there any this book you went from bobby kennedy to newt gingrich. was there any compelling catalyst? in other words, were there transcending -- >> one by one the police i held earlier to not seem to work so well. then give you an incident from the war on poverty which i was very much for. i never would have predicted that in 10 years that crime rates would mushroom. that families would start breaking up. in a short compass, looking back on it, with the study group 20 years later, we need to worry about the condition of the elderly. it is so much better.
they looked younger, do more things. with the young it is devastating because of the family breakups and non-formation family. >> you are talking about issues that remain prominent. you are one of the most prominent catholic laypeople in america. religion is central to your being and central to your book. francis.bout pope >> i am very enthusiastic. i was not at first. i was hands-off in the beginning. i was a little suspicious of the populist touch until i saw what it was going to do, how serious it was. what he has done is amazing. he has concentrated on the basics -- love, care for the poor, humility, kindnessess -- those are what matter, really. the rest is housekeeping. >> do you think he is naïve
about capitalism and economics? >> i had to look at john paul ii from a polish direction. it was a learning curve for him. when i think of experiences in argentina and other places in latin america, what he says is true. there is almost no movement for the poor. there is not the upward mobility that my family experienced come -- most americans that come out of poor beginnings. that does not happen it argentina. >> why have so many conservatives in america been so harsh about him or so skeptical or worried? some of it has to do with what he had to do about economics. >> no doubt, that was the weakest part of his address and he seemed surprised by that.
priests, bishops are not trained to do economic analysis. he kept saying that is not what i was doing. it is not extemporized them, but i wish he did not say something to simple things he said. the main thing is that he has his focus right. the main job for christians today in the next 20 years, the underlying job is raise the mass of people out of poverty. we have made tremendous progress over the last 20 years, over one billion. we have our work cut out for us. >> i'm going to get to that in a minute. just to stay on the pope of for a second, do you think his economic theories will change or evolve? you think you'll be less critical of capitalism as he goes through this progress? >> i think he will.
he will see the different world.es of the there is a skepticism throughout the latin world, which i experience when i went to rome to study years and years ago. they write us off as individualists. i don't think we are. i think americans work together the only time i am alone is when i'm on an airplane. [laughter] i answer the first couple of questions -- i teach. what do you teach? the humanities. that is it. i am home free. some conservatives have been apoplectic about other issues. for instance, some of the appointments the pope has made. he removed cardinal burke, a hero to much of america. changes?naling
should conservatives be upset as some seem to be? >> no, you have to keep your eye on the basics. he understands an inner spirit of catholicism that has been growing and building. the wonderful saint at the end of the last century died in 1897. saint teresa, that was her whole message. the basic thing is god is love. he loves us despite our constant faults. that is what we've got -- >> so this is an overreaction from the limbaughs of the world? >> rush does not understand the catholic part of it and he is taking it seriously. i don't blame him for criticizing. when you see something to criticize, go ahead. give the guy a chance to get his feet on the ground, to get his arms around the question of globalization. get his arms around the fact
that capitalism is mostly ideas. practically everything we enjoy in the united states is an idea. >> i want to go back to what you said but the latin states and the upward mobility you experience. that is no longer as true in america as it once was. even canada and western european entries now have more social mobility. 70% of people born poor in this country never make it to middle- class. should government do something about that? >> that is what i've come to think, that the poverty programs, ironically, they have the wrong incentives. for the first time in our history we have a body of people who are generations on welfare. >> we have had a lot of
conservative policies in effect the last 30 years and the social mobility is worse today than it was 30 years ago. >> well, i think under reagan it really -- one thing i notice, it immigrants jump ahead really quickly. we constantly receive a stream of poor people in here. look, my family got here as immigrants. i am grateful for that. >> you became the prime joy of georgetown, pennsylvania. >> a lot of people did. >> michael novak, thank you for being with us. a fascinating book. happy new year to you.
president rouhani to power. there was secret outreach. it ended in the first ever nuclear interim deal with iran for the first time in 10 years that that has been going on. >> if we were sitting here a year ago, was there any crisis or story we would have anticipated that did not happen? i think you are right about iran. >> if we are talking about the dog that did not bark it was u.s. involvement in syria. president obama had said his red line. he did it in 2012. he said that if chemical weapons
are used it cannot the allowed to stand. it did happen and it may have happened more times before august of this year. they proved it with the august attack and obama walked up to the edge of the precipice, made it seem as if he was going to strike as punishment for that attack and at the last minute he pulled back. he said he would put it to congress and we all know what happened with secretary kerry making at what was called at the time a gaffe, saying that what's they could do to stop u.s. strike is to give up all of its chemical weapons in a week but we know it would never happen. the russians got that and we had a chemical weapons deal and no u.s. strike. >> obama did not have a good year. barack obama did not have a good year. the secretary of state did. >> he has had a surprising first year. he was considered the fallback. susan rice is not confirmed because of her comments about benghazi.
they thought he was going to be a windy politician going around doing things the same old way. what he is done in part because president obama is in his second term and he is willing to take foreign policy risk, and because kerry has turned out to be a high risk-high reward guy. let's not forget who the predecessor is. hillary clinton wanted to make sure she was careful because she may explore a run for president in 2016. kerry got the iran and syria deal. >> including going back to where he served his country some 45 years ago or so, any impressions? >> it was a striking trip. this is a man -- the place where we got to go on a boat with secretary kerry -- literally on the river that shaped the course of his life. not only did he win his silver star, his bronze star, and his purple hearts in the area we were -- it was his first time
back as a civilian -- remember, he was the man who fought for prisoner of war rights and normalization -- >> with john mccain. >> and bob kerrey. it was his service and people impugning his service that sunk his 2004 campaign. seeing the emotion in his eyes while he was on the boat even though he is not known for public emotion, it was amazing. >> even more than barack obama and the washington redskins, it was a lousy year for congress. >> you hear a lot of comparisons to be do-nothing congress. from 1947. that congress passed over 300 bills.
this congress has done less 64. by all accounts it was a bad year. the one thing they did get done was a small budget deal. even that has come under a lot of criticism that it does not do anything to curb the long-term. >> it was a small deal. that really was an outgrowth of the backlash to the government shutdown, wasn't it? >> it was a blow back to the government shutdown. the first government shutdown in 17 years cost the economy about $16 billion. i think that house speaker john boehner saw it was a relations disaster and that the end of the day, the republicans that "the shutdown over obamacare, when you look at how they came out of the battle -- we got the shutdown but did not get the confessions they were seeking -- concessions they were seeking during the battle. i think all parties really is it was a political disaster. >> as the year ends in the house, how much does that -- how much control does house speaker boehner have? >> i think his hand is strengthened.
i think that john boehner knew from the beginning that this spat over obamacare was a losing proposition and he let the tea party in a way run itself into the ground and let them see this was the case. not only did they realize that, but a lot of these outside groups are starting to mobilize now. you saw the consensus around basically firing the head of the republican senate committee, which was a conservative had in the house, because he was too cozy with these outside groups that were pushing on this point. >> a stronger john boehner. let's turn the other side. harry reid employed the nuclear option. buildings are still standing. public seems indifferent. >> you're not seeing a shift -- it is kind of like an infection spreading from the house from the bitterness and the rank or they use on the house to the senate. republicans are very angry about
this. you usually don't make rule changes by simple majority. republicans felt rolled. from the democratic standpoint, there was an unprecedented blockage of nominations. it will add to a lot of the bitterness that we see in both chambers. >> however bitter it gets, it will hard to be worse than it was in 2013. thank you both very much. biggest themes. ♪
>> welcome back. we will get to margaret carlson and lanhee chen in a moment. first, one of the biggest themes of 2013 -- money and politics. as we say, it is always there. this time it was in the republican party, too. >> i think that was the story to watch next year as well. we got a taste of what will happen next year when some the bigger as groups said they were ready to come out and get involved in republican primaries. they are ready to put their money where their mouth is.
>> they talk about, but will they deliver? they are talking about a michigan race and one or two others. will they take on incumbents? >> i think they have some key signs that they are involved in ready. they are helping mitch mcconnell in kentucky fight off a primary contender. >> mitch needs money badly, too, i know. >> it is mostly a symbolic gesture, i think. they are also helping mike simpson. >> speaking of money, hillary clinton who was outspent when she was outraised by barack obama when she ran for president in 2008, is trying to make sure that doesn't happen if you runs again. >> she may not be ready for 2016, but a whole lot people are ready for hillary. that is the name of the super pac that emerged in the
beginning of this year. it was not taken terribly seriously at first but within the first couple of months of the year it established itself as the go to proxy campaign for her whether she is ready or not. what they're doing is not so much raising big money at this point, although they have raised more than $1 million so far, but they are raising resources. they're signing up people, data, voter information, and most importantly supporters who are willing to get out there and work on her behalf. >> the irs scandal which really ended up as a non-scandal, but it may have opened up new rules to end the scam of so-called nonprofits on both sides of the aisle pretending to be nonpolitical. >> i think that is a bit of an optimistic you. that is a ways off. the irs has said they'd like to have some new rules, redefining and expanding the definition of "political activity" for nonprofit. that is years off. rule writing, as you know, is not a simple overnight process. we will hear about this quite a lot next year as they go through
what exactly the rules will involve. >> we know that money will always -- in politics. to margaret and lanhee. let's go through 2013 and look at the best and worst. barack obama clearly had an awful year. who had the best year? >> governor chris christie. it might be obvious, but -- he won red votes, blue votes, and in a blue state. >> chris christie had a great year in 2013. the other guy who had a great year was paul ryan. he was able to broker a bipartisan budget deal but also retain some measure of credibility with the right and continues to have a little bit of mystery about what he's going to do for 2016. >> we lost one of the giants for
this age in 2013 when nelson mandela died a few weeks ago. who else, lanhee, that passed away this year has really left one of those marks for the ages? >> it has to be margaret thatcher. incredibly influential, not just in the u.k. but obviously in the united states. her influence was felt through administration, through many republican politicians. her dialogue and being will be a part of politics for decades to come. >> i would say that about ed koch, the mayor of new york. how am i doing? he changed the way that politics are played and he kept going into his 80's.
>> what was the memorable quote of 2013? >> i'm all about the pope. when he said, who are we to judge? when he said that the catholic church has to be more about what is wrong with people and being more kind, i think he was speaking to gay people. >> one man said let's just hope this does not turn out to be a third world experience. he was right. it turned out to be a third world experience for many americans and obamacare has been a disaster. as what is been the funniest thing? >> the continuing consternation over "duck dynasty." i think it says volumes where we are as a society. >> if by funny you mean ridiculous, i think toronto mayor rob ford who ended the year flapping his arms. with a memorable quote.
>> welcome to a "bloomberg west" special, "the baidu billionaire: inside the google of china." i am emily chang. i sit down with the baidu cofounder, robin li, for a rare, exclusive, live interview. we will talk about how he built baidu into china's largest search engine, and the challenges in a country with censorship. his relationship with tech icons like mark zuckerberg. and what he thinks of apple. but first, here is an introduction to the booming business that is baidu. china is one of the fastest- growing economies and tech industries.